APWWS questions handling of sexual harassment case

In a recent incident, a policewoman reported serious allegations of sexual harassment against the former West Kameng SP in Arunachal Pradesh. This incident has raised concerns about the handling of the case and the need for effective mechanisms to address such complaints. The Arunachal Pradesh Women’s Welfare Society (APWWS) has taken a proactive stance in advocating for justice and demanding accountability in this matter.

The incident unfolded when a policewoman came forward with allegations of sexual harassment against the former West Kameng SP in Arunachal Pradesh. This serious accusation raised concerns within the community and brought attention to the need for a fair investigation and appropriate actions to be taken against the accused.

To address the concerns raised by the policewoman’s allegations, the Arunachal Pradesh Women’s Welfare Society (APWWS) took the initiative to approach the Arunachal Pradesh State Commission for Women (APSCW). The APWWS sought answers regarding the actions taken by the commission to address the issue and ensure justice for the victim.

The APSCW responded to the APWWS by acknowledging that they had received a complaint letter from the victim. On July 3, they wrote to the chairman of the Internal Complaint Committee (ICC), requesting intervention in the case and a status report on the proceedings. This step indicates the commission’s commitment to thoroughly investigate the matter and ensure a fair resolution.

The APWWS further raised concerns about the transfer of the alleged accused from the state while the inquiry was still ongoing. They emphasized that during an inquiry, it is essential to prevent the accused from being transferred until the investigation is completed. The APWWS questioned the conduct of the police department in dealing with the complaint, expressing their doubts about the handling of the case.

The ICC plays a vital role in addressing and resolving complaints of sexual harassment in the workplace. It serves as an in-house mechanism to provide a safe environment for employees and ensure their protection from harassment. Although the ICC does not possess the power to impose penalties, it can recommend disciplinary actions against the accused based on its findings. It is an integral component of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, which aims to safeguard employees from sexual harassment.

Implementing the Act effectively in the state of Arunachal Pradesh presents various challenges, primarily due to the lack of sensitization. APWWS President Kani Nada Maling highlights the importance of sensitizing the state’s workforce, especially the heads of departments, to ensure the proper implementation of the justice delivery system under this Act. Sensitization programs and guidelines are crucial to foster awareness and create a supportive environment for victims of sexual harassment.

Maling emphasizes the necessity for training the members of ICCs and Local Complaint Committees (LCCs) across the state. Equipping these members with a comprehensive understanding of the different sections of the Act will enhance their ability to handle complaints effectively. Additionally, it is crucial for the state government to frame proper guidelines to ensure that justice is delivered promptly and fairly.

Maling raises concerns about the lack of proper offices, honorariums, and funds for ICC and LCC members to carry out their work effectively. Merely appointing members without providing adequate resources hampers the delivery of justice. It is essential for district administrations and various departments to prioritize the allocation of resources and ensure that ICCs and LCCs can function optimally.